91ÊÓƵÍøÕ¾ÎÛ

Advances in high speed milling and hard turning have presented some stiff competition for grinding processes. At the same time, the increasing complexity of part designs demands significantly greater flexibility in grinding capabilities. Faced with these challenges, the future viability of many types of grinding operations depends on the continuous optimization of all process parameters. Because the nature of the interface between wheel and workpiece largely defines grinding quality and efficiency, it’s essential to maintain optimum conditions within this critical zone. Therein lies the key to sustaining grinding as a competitive process.

Using cubic boron nitride (CBN) media to grind steels of 60 HRc or greater is one important way that machine shops have optimized their processes. The principal benefits of CBN tools are longer dressing intervals and reduced idle times. These enable faster, more accurate and economical production of close-tolerance parts across a wide range of machining speeds. In certain applications, CBN wheels can reduce machining times by 50 to 66 percent compared to conventional abrasives.

But choosing a particular grinding medium represents only part of the overall productivity picture. Maintaining an accurate orientation between the grinding wheel and workpiece is fundamental to efficient, high-quality production. Additionally, the wheel’s surface must be maintained in the proper condition. These critical functions are accomplished via profiling and dressing. The relative aggressiveness of grinding tools and the resultant surface finishes depend on the type and quality of dressing procedures. For example, the surface profile of a roughly dressed grinding wheel incorporates relatively high peak-to-valley heights. This makes the wheel sharp and aggressive, but it also transfers the wheel’s surface roughness onto the workpiece. This produces a lower-quality ground surface than that produced by a finely dressed wheel.

Rotary dressing and profiling depend to a significant extent on the rigidity of a grinding machine’s dressing spindle. The relationship of motion between the dressing and grinding tools is also a key factor. “The direction of rotation and the relative circumferential speed between the grinding wheel and the dressing tool change the shape of the grinding wheel,” says Thomas Frisch, project leader of R&D for spindle supplier Fischer AG (U.S. headquarters: Fischer USA Spindle Technologies Inc., New Brighton, Minnesota). “This is decisive for the wheel’s abrading performance and the surface finish of the workpiece.”

Unidirectional dressing occurs when the dressing tool rotates in the same direction as the grinding wheel (whether the two axes of rotation are parallel or perpendicular). This configuration transfers a higher degree of surface roughness to the grinding wheel for applications that demand faster material removal rates. When the surface quality of the workpiece is the principal criterion, however, a counter directional motion is necessary to produce a finely dressed grinding wheel.

A rotary dressing unit incorporates a motorized spindle with either a diamond roll dresser or a diamond dressing-wheel. To achieve precise control of dressing routines, Fischer has developed the RotoDress Motor Dressing spindles, types AES-72 and MZ-50. Incorporating frequency converters, these spindles may be operated at variable speeds up to 30,000 rpm. The spindles are powered by asynchronous, reversible motors.

Another important aspect of process optimization is matching the performance characteristics of the grinding spindle to those of the rotary dressing spindle. Similarly, diamond dressing tools should be chosen for compatibility with specific types of grinding wheels. This underlines the importance of using a supplier that offers a comprehensive range of grinding products.